- From: Delfi Ramirez <delfin@segonquart.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:26:48 +0200
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, Barry Smith <bearzteez@live.com>
I agree with Gary, perfect solution. But, as I reach to understand, there is -- or there will be -- the need, as devices and uses of web pages evolve, for thinking on or considering some new descendant element tags of the ancestor <header>. May we extend the definition of the <header> element beyond_ a group of introductory or navigational aids_? The common and ordinary use that developers and publishers do of a <header> are , for example, to place banners, logos, asides, etcetera, which follow the behavioural pattern of the physical life Shall we do not take in consideration these use for future representations in sectioning elements? I do not see clear the presented in the nightly spec, substep 1.1 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#outline [1] _"create AN IMPLIED HEADING and let that be the heading for the current section."_ An implied heading created,with no semantic content in, does not look 'comfortable' to me. Cheers Links: ------ [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/semantics.html#outline
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2015 08:27:17 UTC