- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:21:25 -0700
- To: Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Robert Bīndar <robertbindar@gmail.com>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > For an app that uses non-persistent notifications, such as gmail, I > think we have two options. Either use Notification.get() here too. Or > we allow "close" events to be fired for non-persistent notifications. Actually, I just realized that perhaps neither of these would work. We've elsewhere in this thread talked about restricting Notification.get() to only return persistent notifications. And I think that on at least some platforms, possibly even most, non-persistent notifications are closed after a timeout. So the "close" event wouldn't indicate any user intent there. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 19:22:20 UTC