W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] Gapless playback problems with web audio standards

From: Dale Curtis <dalecurtis@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:06:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPUDrwdfXXeuGJ0xRvjMsdJVF12_p=AmrY3zyuSqeX-TY0dw4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com>
Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Yes, both WebAudio and MSE can do that, though I'd probably lean towards
WebAudio for anything game related. Using WebAudio just create a buffer
source and set the loop attribute:


The way you could do it with MediaSource would be to "double buffer" the
track such that you're creating an infinite stream. I.e. append a new copy
of the track as time reaches the end of the previously appended track. To
avoid unnecessary memory usage you would remove stale copies of the data
once played.

- dale

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com> wrote:

> Can this be used for gapless looping of the same track? This is a common
> request for game developers looking to seamlessly loop a music or ambience
> track: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=353072
> Ashley
> On 27 October 2014 20:09, Dale Curtis <dalecurtis@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Chrome developer here, gapless playback should work with both WebAudio and
>> Media Source Extensions (MSE). I've fixed bugs in both implementations, so
>> if you have some test cases in Chrome that fail, I'd love to see them. As
>> luck has it, I've recently put an article together on how to use MSE for
>> gapless playback:
>> http://dalecurtis.github.io/llama-demo/index.html
>> We'll be posting it to HTML5Rocks in the near future. Feel free to contact
>> me if you have any questions. You also note that setTimeout() is not
>> precise enough for your usage; you should take a look at the WebAudio
>> scheduler or using WebWorkers:
>> http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/audio/scheduling/
>> https://github.com/chrisguttandin/worker-timers
>> If you only need your project to work in the foreground using
>> requestAnimationFrame is also an option. I'd first try to schedule as much
>> as you can in advance though.
>> - dale
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:07:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC