W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Write-only submittable form-associated controls.

From: Eduardo Robles Elvira <edulix@agoravoting.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:37:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHwZu3eo8jzxYFAow1hMPdTVofcEQ+nJQoV8QO_aQ59J1Lcr=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> 1. If you can spin up a service worker, the site is already very much in
> trouble.
> 2. I have handwavey ideas about ensuring that the FormData object which
> would be readable via the Request object in the service worker would retain
> the opaque flag. The spec strawman hints at that, but I haven't done the
> work to find all the places to monkey-patch.


Just a quick question: how does this relate to the COWL proposal [1]?
labeled contexts/communication seems to be - in general - a good idea
to implement what you propose.

[1] http://cowl.ws/
Eduardo Robles Elvira     @edulix             skype: edulix2
http://agoravoting.org       @agoravoting     +34 634 571 634
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 15:39:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC