- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:57:30 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: whatWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Given all of the above, would you suggest changing the spec or the expected > test results? You said "The expected results are an object that returns the original href, but empty values for all other properties. I don't see this behavior in the spec" but that is how the API works (more or less, protocol would return ":"). You'd have to explain in a little more detail what you think is wrong before I can answer this. >> Looking at the first of those >> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/13/urltest-results/eb3950fcc8 >> it seems something might be broken here on your end. > > Can you explain what you think is broken? It isn't completely obvious, but > the input string in that case contains U+200B, U+2060, U+FEFF: Sure, but 1) per IDNA those are ignored, and 2) urltestdata.txt does not contain the output you have for "whatwg". -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 08:57:54 UTC