W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:59:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78huo34F4aNkEHd0vdWM-W8Ey8Attv7HhVFvxCEGiKL8hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 12:42 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/24f081633d
>>
>> This does not match what I find in browsers. (I did not look through
>> the list exhaustively, see below, but since this was the first one...)
>
> Can you explain the methodology you used?

Sure, I gave "?" as input and then checked the serialized URL (since
you can't trust the search property).
https://dump.testsuite.org/url/inspect.html works for this.


> wget http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest
> wget http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltestdata.json
>
> TL:DR; I created a page with a script that (a) fetches input data using XHR;
> (b) updates an <a> and a <base> element and then captures various properties
> for each test, and (c) posts the result using XHR.

Is there a chance that the library on the server does not pick up on a lone "?"?


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 17:00:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC