W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:42:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78gjJw1jgVzgBrq0zA+Oww2HRJ+3jgv1S2AN6_TyYKZvcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/24f081633d

This does not match what I find in browsers. (I did not look through
the list exhaustively, see below, but since this was the first one...)

I also found out today that
has not been checked against the specification. So all those tests are
likely wrong. File URLs differ per browser and per platform so there
will always be differences there. I tried to come up with a sensible
algorithm, but it might need checking again.

Overall, the URL specification could likely use another month of
serious work on the parser side. It is not clear to me now would be
good to invest that time. I would like to see some more interest from
implementers first.

Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 16:43:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC