W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2014

Re: [whatwg] Adding a property to navigator for getting device model

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:51:17 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=CPSfi=c-Arg1-et5aKAUW_8J9yKALbLQLNUMP9MVuMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, at 15:01, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, at 11:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Do you have any data that makes you think that those websites would stop
>>> > using UA sniffing but start using navigator.deviceModel if they had that
>>> > property available?
>>>
>>> I know that the Cordova module for exposing this information is one of
>>> the most popular Cordova modules, so that's a pretty good indication.
>>> But I don't have data directly from websites.
>>
>> When you were pointing that websites currently do UA sniffing is it on
>> the client side of the server side?
>
> I'd imagine UA sniffing happens more often on the server side, though
> I suspect it varies with the reason why people do it.
>
> But the Cordova API is client side, so there's definitely desire to
> have it there too.

I was under the impression that we are mostly talking client-side so
that JavaScript can adapt the choice of features to what is available
in the browser. Server-side information is merely a side effect
(which, of course, is exploited for marketing and other purposes, but
not something we can really avoid).

Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:24 UTC