- From: Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:57:07 -0600
- To: Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Is it really the responsibility of HTML to be told about this? I wouldn't think so. My initial thoughts are that all such information should be encoded in the file format of the image. I am not saying such information exists (maybe partially though), but that's where I think it should reside. Cheers, Paul On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 November 2014 13:10, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > These are just alternate image formats, yes? In that case, browsers > > can expand their <img> support to allow pointing to these kinds of > > files. They'd need some sort of native controls on the <img> element, > > I suppose. > > I see image taken using different lens have different distortion > > http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/758743-REG/Eyesee_360_GPP_3AP6_1PW_GoPano_Plus_Panoramic_Camera.html/prm/alsVwDtl > So dont we need to pass some parameters to inform what kind of lens was > used. > That is whether special kind of lens like above, or some thing with > Android Camera Panorama feature etc. >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 05:57:34 UTC