W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2014

Re: [whatwg] HTML tags.Panorama, Photo Sphere, Surround shots

From: Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:57:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CABLGb9wsNB8tkegjAHHZqKEBp8CzCCU5rZw1xyL_2P8u_G4gZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Is it really the responsibility of HTML to be told about this? I wouldn't
think so. My initial thoughts are that all such information should be
encoded in the file format of the image. I am not saying such information
exists (maybe partially though), but that's where I think it should reside.


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Biju <bijumaillist@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 17 November 2014 13:10, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > These are just alternate image formats, yes?  In that case, browsers
> > can expand their <img> support to allow pointing to these kinds of
> > files.  They'd need some sort of native controls on the <img> element,
> > I suppose.
> I see image taken using different lens have different distortion
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/758743-REG/Eyesee_360_GPP_3AP6_1PW_GoPano_Plus_Panoramic_Camera.html/prm/alsVwDtl
> So dont we need to pass some parameters to inform what kind of lens was
> used.
> That is whether special kind of lens like above, or some thing with
> Android Camera Panorama feature etc.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 05:57:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:26 UTC