- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:04 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: WhatWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
On Nov 2, 2014, at 20:05 , Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Third, here's a completely different approach to defining URLs that produces the same results (modulo one parse error that Anne agrees[2] should changed in be in the WHATWG spec): > > http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#url > I rather like this. The readability is much better (I am not a fan of the current trend of writing specifications in pseudo-basic, which makes life easier for implementers and terrible for anyone else, including authors), and I also think that an approach that doesn’t obsolete RFC 3986 is attractive. David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 15:19:45 UTC