Re: [whatwg] Proposal: defining script as <link rel="script" href="actualwaytoscript"> from Тимофей Маринин on 2014-06-26 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from June 2014)

From: Тимофей Маринин <marinintim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:57:29 +0400
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Message-Id: <4B9E9891-0CE4-404C-A925-10690D0FA294@gmail.com>

Отправлено с iPhone

> 26 июня 2014 г., в 19:31, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> написал(а):
> 
>> On 6/26/14, 10:39 AM, Tim Marinin wrote:
>> If not, then why we need <link> for css, only for legacy reasons?
> 
> Pretty much, yes.  If <style> were allowed in <head>, we could just do <style src> (and in fact Gecko had support for that at one point).
> 
Do you mean "if style src were supported"? Because otherwise I don't understand: a lot of sites uses inline styles in head, e.g. Jsfiddle's iframe.

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 18:57:59 UTC