- From: Tim Marinin <marinintim@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:39:55 +0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, whatwg@whatwg.org
2014-06-26 14:12 GMT+04:00 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Tim Marinin <marinintim@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I propose exact the same behaviour, as <script> with src, these drawback > > will apply to <script> as well, don't they? > > No, <script> is known to link to scripts by existing filters. > > Why we can't use existing filters? > > > Upsides are not functional, but semantic. It's a way to unify linking > script > > and style, step to separate javascript from markup. > > That doesn't really seem like sufficient justification. > The same justification as with <style> tag. If not, then why we need <link> for css, only for legacy reasons? > > > P.S. I'm new to mail lists, should I answer to your directly or mail > back to > > whatwg@whatwg.com? > > Usually replies go back to the list. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:40:20 UTC