- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:18:08 -0700
- To: Robert Bindar <robertbindar@gmail.com>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, James Burke <jburke@mozilla.com>, julienw@mozilla.com, Michael Henretty <mhenretty@mozilla.com>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Robert Bindar <robertbindar@gmail.com> wrote: > My thought is to firstly introduce a small package of behaviors that > would include "lights", "vibration" and "disrupting" > (and maybe "noclear" too). > The default value for all these 3 behaviors is false. I don't think we'll want to default "lights" and "vibration" to false. And I still have concerns that exposing "vibration" as a boolean could mean that a notification goes completely silent, even though neither the user or the application intended for that. Also, how is "disrupting" intended to work? As I understand it, the current spec already defines that if you create a notification using a tag of an already-existing notification, that it just updates that notification without otherwise notifying the user. So how are you envisioning that disrupting would alter that behavior? / Jonas
Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 22:19:02 UTC