- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:22:08 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 06/26/2014 12:50 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2014, at 21:20, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: >>> On June 26, 2014 at 1:58:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalmage@gmail.com) >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Here's a first crack at a better spec: >>> >>> >>> Moved your text here: >>> >>> https://github.com/whatwg/meta-brand-color >> >> >> Could we change the name to something a tad more neutral and >> extendable, e.g.: ua-background-color? Like that, people that use the >> Web for things other than brand promotion don't feel offended, and we >> can add ua-color once devs start requesting it while keeping >> consistent with CSS. > > > It's not the UA's color you're after here, it's the page's own > theming color, right? So theme-color or accent-color might make > more sense. Yeah, we ended up at theme-color after much back-and-forth: https://github.com/whatwg/meta-theme-color Adam
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 04:23:15 UTC