- From: Jesper Kristensen <mail@jesperkristensen.dk>
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:51:45 +0200
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Den 14-08-2014 kl. 23:02 skrev Jonas Sicking: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Jesper Kristensen > <mail@jesperkristensen.dk> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Would it make sense to tie the system lock to a notification? >> >> For example: >> >> new Notification("Processing...", {tag: "abc", progressBar: 0.8, wakeLock: >> "system"}); >> >> There are many myths and rumors about how to conserve battery on mobile >> devices. A small improvement could be to require apps to show some kind of >> UI whenever they are allowed to consume resources in the background. > > The main use case for system locks in my mind is for applications that > need to do some short but important processing. For example a camera > app wanting to do some HDR processing of an image before saving it to > disk. It seems like it would be very annoying if a notification was > shown any time the user took a picture. > > I still think it's a very interesting idea though. Both Android and iOS have notifications showing whenever any app does background sync (although you cannot easily see which app it is, which I think is an issue). So I think it can be implemented in a way that is not too annoying. In addition you could choose to only show the notification when the page holding the lock is in the background. /Jesper Kristensen
Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 16:52:08 UTC