- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:24:26 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Alexandre Morgaut <Alexandre.Morgaut@4d.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On 13/09/2013 13:31 , Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 13.9.2013 12:10, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> I would rather we figured this out without <link>, but apart from the
>> indirection I reckon this approach has some nice properties and might
>> work if more direct ones don't.
>
> Also don't forget that while linking is the hardest part of this ZIP
> circus there is another missing piece -- normative definition of
> portable and RF subset of ZIP. SC34 started some initial work on such
> ZIP profile recently:
>
> http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1855.pdf
>
> So if some sort of ZIP packaging spec should to appear then it should
> reference such subset of ZIP not the full definition of ZIP format from
> PKWare.
This has also been done, perhaps not to a sufficient extent, in Widgets:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#zip-archive
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 12:25:06 UTC