- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:14:52 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
* Anne van Kesteren wrote: >I also filed some browser bugs just in case people are not paying >attention here: > >* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933193 >* http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=313655 >* https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123565 > >Should really have a way to file a bug on all browsers whenever >something like this comes up... What we should have is proper automated test suites that let us know what web browsers do and do not implement. Creating rudimentary tests for the relevant cases here probably takes less effort in addition to being far more valuable than filing the bug reports. I tested with http://shadowregistry.org/js/misc/#t6edb2a2b01f100f64f8f372bd3826328 and that seems to confirm my suspicion, even if we ignore that such a test can be automatically derived from the interface description. All I did was appending // SVGSVGElement.prototype.getElementById is defined return !!SVGSVGElement.prototype.getElementById; to a text file. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 14:15:21 UTC