W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2013

Re: [whatwg] Canvas in workers

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:24:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLa52BRyt8XgZOieFB9Fb5UdnyzeDBfHk6tq=eEKRYa4ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
We talked through this proposal with a lot of Mozilla people in a meeting
and collectively decided that we don't care about the case of workers that
commit multiple frames to a canvas without yielding --- at least for now.
So we want to remove commit() and copy the main-thread semantics that a
canvas frame is eligible for presentation whenever script is not running in
the worker.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 09:24:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:12 UTC