- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:53:34 +1300
- To: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- Cc: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> wrote: > Yes, right. That factory method is already spec'ed on the > WorkerGlobalScope [1]. It actually returns a Promise, so presumably > transferToImageBitmap would have to as well. > The whole point of transferToImageBitmap is that it's really fast, so I don't see why it has to be async. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:53:59 UTC