W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2013

Re: [whatwg] Should onfoo event handler properties be on Element or HTMLElement?

From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:31:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMQvoCkumfbumjzYBGB1m51dA5EKuCJBb-aOkJkqf_+vsTCAhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:53:29 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
> wrote:
> ...
>> OK, I hadn't considered that moving this to Element would imply the
>> content attributes being reflected for all namespaces. Even though
>> Blink has the IDL attributes on Element, it looks like the reflection
>> with the content attributes only works for HTMLElement and SVGElement.
>> In other words, "whatever Blink does" doesn't look like something
>> worth standardizing.
>> Erik, does going with "SVGElement implements GlobalEventHandlers"
>> (like Gecko) seems like a way forward for the SVG spec?
>> Philip
> Given the reasons brought up in this thread I should think that the WG would
> agree that "SVGElement implements GlobalEventHandlers" is an acceptable way
> forward.

OK, that's what I'll try to get implemented in Blink. Thanks all!

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 18:31:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:11 UTC