W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2013

Re: [whatwg] Should onfoo event handler properties be on Element or HTMLElement?

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:29:03 +0200
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Message-ID: <op.w4op6pz5geuyw5@gnorps>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:53:29 +0200, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>  
wrote:

...
> OK, I hadn't considered that moving this to Element would imply the
> content attributes being reflected for all namespaces. Even though
> Blink has the IDL attributes on Element, it looks like the reflection
> with the content attributes only works for HTMLElement and SVGElement.
> In other words, "whatever Blink does" doesn't look like something
> worth standardizing.
>
> Erik, does going with "SVGElement implements GlobalEventHandlers"
> (like Gecko) seems like a way forward for the SVG spec?
>
> Philip

Given the reasons brought up in this thread I should think that the WG  
would agree that "SVGElement implements GlobalEventHandlers" is an  
acceptable way forward.


-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 11:29:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:11 UTC