W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:53:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDL=84X9HnJkweWvr1JhP8+w=mmcvedYipPh4kgR5bAAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
[resending because of a bounced message]

DrawingPath is saying the same thing twice.
Maybe DOMDrawing is better? (with "drawing" the definition of
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/drawing?q=drawing)


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> I bikeshed-+1 Elliott's earlier suggestion of DrawingPath.
>
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 06:54:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC