- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 19:20:51 +0300
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
2013-05-03 18:37, Simon Pieters wrote: > The past few days I've been working on updating the HTML differences > from HTML4 document, which is a deliverable of the W3C HTML WG but is > now also available as a version with the WHATWG style sheet: > > http://html-differences.whatwg.org/ I think you should start from making the title sensible. "HTML differences from HTML4" is too esoteric even in this context. Think about a heading "FOO differences from FOO9". Wouldn't you say that some FOOist is writing very obscurely? Besides, the spelling is "HTML 4". Especially if you think HTML 4 is ancient history, retain the historical spelling. Yucca
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 16:21:15 UTC