- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:12:26 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 2013-03-13 21:24, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/13/13 4:23 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Under RFC 3986, it would resolve to >> >> jar:http://example.com/Bar.class > > If you assume that this is a hierarchical scheme and that the hierarchy > is in some particular place, no? Why is that assumption being made? No such assumption was made. Just following the algorithm in the spec. >> Looks like a broken scheme to me. > > I'm not going to try to claim jar: is a wonderful thing. It is what it > is. It needs to not break. Is it used outside Java applet scenarios? BTW: this shows why formal registration and review of URI schemes is a *feature*. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 08:12:54 UTC