- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:24:47 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 3/13/13 4:23 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Under RFC 3986, it would resolve to > > jar:http://example.com/Bar.class If you assume that this is a hierarchical scheme and that the hierarchy is in some particular place, no? Why is that assumption being made? > Looks like a broken scheme to me. I'm not going to try to claim jar: is a wonderful thing. It is what it is. It needs to not break. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 20:25:14 UTC