- From: Aaron Boodman <aa@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:53:52 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: WHAT working group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
I think that there would be many uses for a mechanism that allows developers to take part in letting the UA known when it is "ready". For example, we would use then when analyzing extension code server-side. Another example would be systems that take screenshots of web pages for use in browser start pages, or search results. - a On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 4/29/13 6:50 AM, James Graham wrote: > >> So far we have kept the model where the load event is auomatically >> managed by the UA, rather than giving the developer direct control of it. >> > > Developers already have direct control over the load event to the extent > being proposed, as far as I can tell. Consider this: > > var blockers = []; > function blockOnload() { > var i = document.createElement("**iframe"); > document.documentElement.**appendChild(i); > blockers.push(i.**contentDocument); > i.contentDocument.open(); > } > > function unblockOnload() { > blockers.pop().close(); > } > > Of course expecting web developers to come up with this themselves and > have to redo all this boilerplate is not reasonable, not to mention the > pollutes-the-DOM and uses-way-too-much-memory aspect of it all. > > -Boris >
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 19:54:47 UTC