- From: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:37:13 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Sep 11, 2012 11:35 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ... > > Also, how does your proposal address > > flowing text inside of a <path>? > > That's a good question! Presumably you mean that, for example, one > might want to have emphasized text in a text-along-a-path flow? I > suppose it should be as easy as making them children of a <textPath>, > and setting "display:svg" to make them obey SVG rendering rules rather > than the CSS box model. I mean if you look at the svg flow spec there's an example of text inside a polygon or even text flowing inside of large bubble letters. Similar concept as CSS exclusions, but it doesn't make sense to specify the polygon twice to use that. > > > A strawman of the JSON spec rewritten with your proposal would be useful. > > I don't understand this request. > Sorry its not the JSON spec, it just had a similar theme (my confusion). I meant could you rewrite the railroad svg from your original email to show how this is better? http://www.xanthir.com/etc/railroad-diagrams/example.html - E
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 19:37:42 UTC