- From: Mark Callow <callow.mark@artspark.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:09:15 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 2012/10/10 6:49, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Mark Callow wrote: >>> On 2012/10/06 7:09, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>> I agree, when there's 3x displays, this could get to the point where we >>>> need to solve it. :-) >>> With the current displays, it's just not that big a deal, IMHO. If by 3x >>> you mean displays whose dpi is 3x that of CSS pixels (96dpi), they >>> already exist in retail products. I saw 2 last week. >> Can you elaborate? >> >> How many device pixels per CSS pixel do browsers on those devices use? Are >> they just making CSS pixels smaller, or are they actually using 3x? > http://www.zdnet.com/google-nexus-10-tablet-to-have-higher-res-display-than-ipad-7000005466/ > appears to be 299dpi One of the devices I saw last week is a 10" display with 299dpi; I strongly suspect it is the one that will be used in this Nexus tablet. The other device is already on sale. A Sharp SH-10D smartphone sold by NTT Docomo. It has a 329 dpi display. > http://www.iclarified.com/entry/index.php?enid=22223 appears to be 440dpi > > These devices aren't out yet, but I suspect browsers would be > more-or-less as high-dpi as possible. I don't know what the browser on the SH-10D is doing, (It's running Android 4.0) but, given the physical size (4.5"), if they were making the css pixels smaller, the content would be unreadable. I expect they are actually using 3x. Regards -Mark -- 注意:この電子メールには、株式会社エイチアイの機密情報が含まれている場合 が有ります。正式なメール受信者では無い場合はメール複製、 再配信または情 報の使用を固く禁じております。エラー、手違いでこのメールを受け取られまし たら削除を行い配信者にご連絡をお願いいたし ます. NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and privileged information from HI Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the contents of the received information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this message and all related copies.
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 03:09:56 UTC