- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:59:11 -0700
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: "whatwg@lists.whatwg.org" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Can you please move this discussion to another thread and discuss the Path object on this thread? Greetings, Dirk On Oct 5, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > >> Yes, but at the cost of performance and memory usage that just doesn't >> seem worthwhile here. >> > > Is there really a nontrivial cost to a one-time warning, the first time a > window attribute is resolved this way? (Warning once per ID would be nice, > but warning once per page load serves the purpose.) It sounds like a > single branch at most. > > And web developers get annoyed when UAs warn about various spec-compliant >> stuff they're doing, in my experience. >> > > I'm a web developer, and I get annoyed at not being told when I'm doing > something obviously bad, so you'll have to pick which group to annoy: > people who want to write reliable webpages, or those who don't. > > -- > Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 21:59:43 UTC