On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > CGs actually have very little patent obligation compared to W3C Working Groups, so Apple has lighter weight approval for those than for WGs. Perhaps Google could consider the same thing. I believe the CG rules would not allow an employee of a W3C Member company to be a "free agent" though. I can't speak for our lawyers, but I do plan to complain about the situation internally. It adds a pretty tremendous mental transaction cost to me joining a CG, and that's unfortunate. ~TJReceived on Friday, 18 May 2012 00:19:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:42 UTC