- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:01:49 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On May 15, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Thu, 10 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> 3.125x isn't particularly difficult to specify. > > I actually didn't even realize that 300dpi is 3.125 times 96dpi. > > Regardless, I think being able to specify "300dpi" is easier than > using a calculator. On the other hand, checking for an integer X factor is easier than checking for an integer multiple of 96dpi, for authors who would like to avoid the ugly visual artifacts of non-integral scaling. Which I hope is all of them. It's easier to tell that 3.125x is a bad idea than with 300dpi. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 19:02:44 UTC