- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:01:06 +0200
- To: Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com>
- Cc: WHATWG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox <mail@matthewwilcox.com> wrote: > have any of you seen this proposal for an alternative solution to the problem? > > http://www.w3.org/community/respimg/2012/05/13/an-alternative-proposition-to-and-srcset-with-wider-scope/ > > I like the general idea and from an author perspective this seems > great; but I know nothing of the browser/vendor side of the equation - > is this do-able? Adding a level of indirection is actually not that great as it makes it harder to understand what is going on. Also if you work on sites in teams it's not always a given access to <head> is equal to the templates that are being authored. Let alone full control over how resources are stored. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 10:01:37 UTC