On Tue, 01 May 2012 18:12:36 -0700, Evan Jones <evanj at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > ? this seems contradictory: Encode using RFC 2388, but do not using the > encoding suggested by the RFC. Worse, no browser actually follows the > RFC (e.g. they all use UTF-8 encoded parameter values), so that doesn't > seem like the right answer. Is there a way out of this mess? Yes. I think we should define multipart/form-data directly in HTML and thereby obsolete http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2388 as it is outdated and not maintained. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 14:09:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:41 UTC