- From: Ashley Sheridan <ash@ashleysheridan.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 19:37:48 +0100
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 04:33 +1000, Shaun Moss wrote: > The way things are done is not always the best way. Most colour pickers > are used in instances where "not selected" would make no sense. > > However, as you're designing a widget for the web that may be used by > billions of people in any number of unforeseen ways, flexibility is a > virtue, and the option to clear the field would be an improvement. If > you don't allow a "not selected" or null option, this would basically > force all colour widgets to be required fields, which may not be what > the form designer wants. > > To compare, some date pickers do not allow you to clear the field, but > some do. For the web, it's a useful feature. > > Shaun > > > On 2012-05-03 11:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 03 May 2012 02:10:11 -0700, Markus Ernst <derernst at gmx.ch> wrote: > >> If I understand the spec correctly, entering no value defaults to > >> #000000, thus the required attribute does not apply. What are the > >> reasons for this? I am sure there were good reasons to specify it > >> this way, anyway I don't see them right now. "Not selected" is > >> actually very different from "black". > > > > "Not selected" is not something typically supported by native color > > pickers. > > > > > Would the colour pickers allow the selection of the alpha channel at the time of choosing? If so, couldn't you allow a full transparent colour to be used where null couldn't? -- Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 11:37:48 UTC