- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 22:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Given that SVG also has classes, it would make some sense to move > classList from HTMLElement to Element. That way SVG, and any other > languages that define classes (XUL comes to mind, actually) can benefit > from it as well. > > Note that Gecko's current classList implementation lives on Element. How do you handle the difference between SVG and HTML's className? I think it would be confusing to have classList work the same on both but not className. (Currently, DOM Core and HTML both define classList; the former on Element and the latter on HTMLElement, because Anne and I disagree on what should happen here.) For the spec's purposes my plan is to follow whatever implementations converge on. Currently WebKit does what the HTML/SVG specs say (.className is a string in HTML, an object in SVG, and .classList is HTML-specific), Gecko does a mixture of DOM Core and HTML/SVG say (.className is a string in HTML, an object in SVG, and .classList is on both but returns null in unknown namespaces), and Opera does a different mixture (.className is a string in HTML, an object in SVG, and .classList is on SVG and HTML nodes but not on nodes from unknown namespaces). (Didn't have other browsers available to test on this machine.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 15:09:09 UTC