- From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:18:31 -0500
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Ashley Sheridan <ash at ashleysheridan.co.uk>wrote: > But wouldn't this all break one of the key reasons why shared libraries > are useful? If I'm using a shared Javascript library hosted on Google > Code, for example, and there's an urgent security update, I'd want it to > be applied and not left out. Also, plenty of the hosted libraries are at > URLs that will grab the latest stable release of something. I don't want > my site to break overnight just because the latest stable release for a > library came out whilst I was asleep. > So don't opt-in? Also, these cases imply that you're utilizing CDNs that don't provide a good caching benefit.
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 11:18:31 UTC