- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:49:47 -0800
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > So I guess we have to make a decision for the platform here. > > Do we want: > > ?- To spec window.find() in all its historical glory, and have it > ? implemented everywhere? > > ?- To spec a subset of window.find() that just does the use case described > ? above, namely to destructively change the selection to a matching part > ? of the DOM so that it can be manipulated by script? > > ?- To spec a new API that just returns matching ranges and then allows > ? those ranges to be manipulated like the selection can be today? > > ?- To encourage authors to write a library that does this for them, and > ? not bother to provide a dedicated API at all? > > Which would implementations that don't do the full window.find() today be > willing to do? As far as I know, we (google) would prefer to do nothing with window.find(), so we can use it for the Selectors API. No opinion on whether the functionality is useful under another name. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 11:49:47 UTC