W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2012

[whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs common quoting practices

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:04:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4F378E9D.7000900@cs.tut.fi>
2012-02-12 8:36, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:

>> Since in current usage, <blockquote>  means just ?indent? more often
>> than not, browsers and search engines should not and will not imply
>> any specific semantics for it. Thus it will be pointless to use it.
> Riveting tale, chap. Can you provide proof?

Regarding browsers and search engines, what else could constitute a 
proof than the absence of any information about them doing anything with 
<blockquote>? Apart from the obvious default rendering, with indents, 
that is.

Regarding the usage, I have not collected statistics on this during my 
20 years of browsing web pages, and I don?t think anyone has. So 
objective argumentation is somewhat difficult. In this discussion, I 
mentioned the WIPO document
issued by a reputable organization, and if you look at the source code, 
you?ll see that the page uses <blockquote> just for subparagraphs, not 
for quotations. I?m sure that if you start looking around, you?ll see 
<blockquote> used mostly for mere indentation.

Received on Sunday, 12 February 2012 02:04:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:39 UTC