- From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:00:26 -0000
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:16:36 -0000, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur <anselm at novolo.de> wrote: > Okay, I talked with some disabled web developers and Accessibility > experts today and talked about the proposal of markup in alt-text. > This seems not to be a good idea as screenreader would read the tags > which would confuse many users then. > So we would get into trouble with that approach according to current > screenreader features, etc. > This applies only to attributes. Elements can and do have element children, while attributes can only contain plain text. We should not redefine the alt attribute. A new element has been proposed in the list whose contents can be defined to be an alternative representation of the linked resource. Preferably we could just reuse elements and semantics where appropriate. <Object data="lolcats.gif title="An animated image macro of mine" type="image/gif"> <p><b>Nazi Cats</b></p> <p>Humans have been obsoleted.</p> </Object> <Object data="lolcat.gif" title="An animated image macro of mine" type="image/gif"> <Img src="lolcat.jpeg" title="An image macro of mine" alt="Nazi Cats. Humans are now obsolete."> </Object> As has been pointed out in the thread already, using <object> fallbacks of different media types may result in strange behavior, and is hard to implement correctly.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 06:00:26 UTC