- From: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:52:23 -0500
On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:38 AM, David Goss wrote: > <picture alt="alternative text" src="default.jpg"> > <source href="medium.jpg" media="min-width:400px" /> > <source href="large.jpg" media="min-width:700px" /> > <img alt="alternative text" src="default.jpg" /> > </picture> > > Becomes this: > > <img alt="alternative text" src="default.jpg" list="myimage" /> > <srclist id="myimage"> > <source href="medium.jpg" media="min-width:400px" /> > <source href="large.jpg" media="min-width:700px" /> > </srclist> This feels a bit convoluted to me, to be honest?the addition of the non-semantic, non-display <srclist> gives me the creeps. It also leave us with two different markup patterns that serve the same goal, though not radically different by any means. Don?t get me wrong: I?d be okay with this pattern?hell, I?m receptive to any potential solution. I just feel there?s something to be said for keeping the element consistent and self-contained.
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 05:52:23 UTC