- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:29:38 -0500
On 2/7/12 5:06 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I agree about this. But realise that if we take your zoom use case to > it's logical conclusion, we'd need to supply images at an infinite > resolution. Which is patently absurd. With visual media, it is > expected, and the only practical thing, to have pixelation at zooms > higher than one CSS pixel. I don't think that's expected if your initial zoom level maps a single CSS px to multiple device pixels. If my device runs at 300dpi by default, I should be able to zoom in 3x or so before any pixelation happens, I'd hope. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 14:29:38 UTC