[whatwg] add html-attribute for "responsive images"

Can you clarify why the image would be loaded twice?

Can we not, as part of the logic for the <picture> element, say that <img>
is ignored in supporting browsers? Thus, never called by a supporting
browser. Non supporting browsers wouldn't load the <src> elements and would
only load the <img>

Right?

On 7 February 2012 10:31, Anselm Hannemann <anselm at novolo.de> wrote:

> Am 07.02.2012 um 11:16 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
>
> 2012/2/7 Anselm Hannemann ? Novolo Designagentur <anselm at novolo.de>
>
>> Ashley,
>>
>> so you think about the <img> element attributes like I proposed?
>> <img src="myimage_xs.jpg" media-xs="(min-device-width:320px and
>> max-device-width:640px)" media-src-xs="myimage_xs.jpg"
>> media-m="(min-device-width:640px and max-device-width:1024px)"
>> media-src-m="myimage_m.jpg" media-xl="(min-device-width:1024px)"
>> media-src-xl="myimage_xsl.jpg">
>> (View as gist: https://gist.github.com/1158855)
>>
>
> This, to me, is WAY too over-wrought to be useful. Readability is a
> feature of HTML and this kind of kills that a little - it looks like
> something some automated solution would spit out, not what a human would
> author. I can't imagine it getting much uptake with web developers for that
> reason alone (I put my hand up, I'm a member of that fickle bunch).
>
>
> Yeah this is indeed true. I just want this as an option which is a
> semantically valid approach. But you're totally right at readability.
>
> To me this makes most sense /from an author perspective/ (I make no claims
> as to how practical this really is):
>
> <picture>
>   <src href="small.jpg" alt="a headshot of Bob Flemming"
> media="min-width:320" />
>   <src href="medium.jpg" alt="a head and shoulders shot of Bob Flemming"
> media="min-width:480" />
>   <src href="large.jpg" alt="a full body portrait of Bob Flemming"
> media="min-width:640" />
>
>   <!-- fallback for old browsers with no support for picture element) -->
>   <img src="default.jpg" alt="A photo of Bob Flemming" />
> </picture>
>
> The reason being:
>
> * it's easy to read
> * it uses familiar element structures and properties
> * it allows us to adjust to any given media requirement, not just screen
> size (you could query bandwidth with this syntax, though I contest
> bandwidth is the domain of server side adaption rather than client side)
>
>
> This is a good solution except the fallback img element would be twice
> loaded in your case which is not good.
> There should be the img element containing the standard (normal) size and
> src elements to add diff. other resolutions. With that the browser won't
> load the resource twice.
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 02:34:03 UTC