W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2012

[whatwg] RWD Heaven: if browsers reported device capabilities in a request header

From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:43:43 +0100
Message-ID: <20120206184343.1171a74f@desudesudesu>
James Graham <jgraham at opera.com> schrieb am Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:42:16
+0100:

> [?]

> A typical thing that people want to do is to deliver and display
> *less* content in small (measured in arcseconds) screen scenarios. If
> you are only going to show a subset of the full content it would be
> nice to only do a subset of the backend work (database queries +
> etc.) and transfer a subset of the full data. At the moment this is
> possible, but you pay for it with an extra RTT (at least as far as I
> can tell).

> I am sympathetic to the view that it would be desirable to
> be able to minimise the cost of generating a reduced-functionality
> page without burning the savings on extra round trips.

An argument into the opposite direction can be that making it easier to
create reduced-functionality pages fragments the web. Say, why should
mobile pages have different semantics, not just different layout and
usability?

-- 
Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann
<http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 09:43:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:39 UTC