- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:58:49 -0500
On 2/3/12 3:38 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >> I also believe that we have proposed this for standardization in the >> past, though it seems to have fallen through the cracks a bit... > > I couldn't find any mention of it in the WHATWG archives or Bugzilla, > though I did find an e-mail from sicking saying he'd proposed it to the > WHATWG list. :-( http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/027975.html and then there were some followup mails with broken threading bikeshedding the names looks like. > As noted in the previous e-mail, it's not clear that the content-blocker > use cases are valid. The use case that is compelling for beforescriptexecute > is regarding sites who are trying to address mixed content vulnerabilities > progressively and need to closer control over external script execution. That's the use case I was talking about, but they'd want at least control over stylesheets too, I'd think. -Boris
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 12:58:49 UTC