- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:16:12 +0100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > If we don't have the type checking of array elements, and also don't need > any noticing of individual element assignments, then we can just have a > reference to a plain Array object and look at its elements at the time the > dash array is needed. That could preserve the author expectation that after > assigning a new Array object to the property you would get the same object > back when getting the property. If we make fileList and such assignable you'd also have this discrepancy. I think that's okay. Alternatively, or in addition, we can have new NumberArray(Array). -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 22 December 2012 14:16:43 UTC