- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:07:48 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Gordon P. Hemsley" <gphemsley@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2012-12-04 08:40, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> >> wrote: >>> On 2012-11-29 20:25, Adam Barth wrote: >>>> These are supported in Chrome. That's what causes the download. From >>> >>> Can you elaborate about what you mean by "supported"? Chrome sniffs for >>> the >>> type, and then offers to download as a result of that sniffing? How is >>> that >>> different from not sniffing in the first place? >> >> They might otherwise be treated as a type that can be displayed >> (rather than downloaded). Also, some user agents treat downloads of > > Do you have an example for that case? > >> ZIP archives differently than other sorts of download (e.g., they >> might offer to unzip them). > > Out of curiosity: which? Safari. Adam
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:08:54 UTC