- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:59:31 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: whatwg List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Gordon P. Hemsley" <gphemsley@gmail.com>
On 2012-12-04 08:40, Adam Barth wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2012-11-29 20:25, Adam Barth wrote: >>> These are supported in Chrome. That's what causes the download. From >> >> Can you elaborate about what you mean by "supported"? Chrome sniffs for the >> type, and then offers to download as a result of that sniffing? How is that >> different from not sniffing in the first place? > > They might otherwise be treated as a type that can be displayed > (rather than downloaded). Also, some user agents treat downloads of Do you have an example for that case? > ZIP archives differently than other sorts of download (e.g., they > might offer to unzip them). Out of curiosity: which? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 08:00:24 UTC