W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2012

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:34:30 +0200
Message-ID: <502240B6.3010902@opera.com>
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 08/08/2012 12:27 PM, Markus Ernst wrote:

> It is better because art direction and bandwidth use cases can be solved
> differently in an appropriate manner:
> - For the bandwidth use case, no MQ is needed, but only some information
> on the sources available to let the UA decide which source to load.
> - For the art direction use case OTOH, the <picture> element is more
> intuitive to handle and also easier to script, as sources can be added
> or removed via DOM.

What are the use cases for adding/removing images? It seems to me that 
they would be better addressed by having a good API for interacting with 
srcset rather than adopting an element based design. For example one 
could have HTMLImageElement.addSrc(url, options) where options is a 
dictionary allowing you to set the various srcset options.
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 10:35:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:44 UTC