- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:00:33 +0200
- To: whatwg@whatwg.org
On 08/02/2012 06:57 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > But now consider the short-term cost of adding an element to the head. All > it does is make a few elements in the <head> leak to the <body>. The page > still works fine in legacy UAs (none of the elements only work in the > <head>). But it will break any scripts or selectors that depend on position in the DOM. For that reason I expect many pages that include intents won't "work fine" in UAs that don't have parser support. I agree with Henri that it is extremely worrying to allow aesthetic concerns to trump backward compatibility here. I would also advise strongly against using position in DOM to detect intents support; if you insist on adding a new void element I will strongly recommend that we add it to the parser asap to try and mitigate the above breakage, irrespective of whether our plans for the rest of the intent mechanism.
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 09:01:18 UTC