- From: Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:37:19 -0800
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw at chromium.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw at chromium.org> wrote: >>>> Big question: by what mechanism are these elements inert? >>> >>> I like Adam's suggestion of a new document without a browsing context. >>> ?You can still move the elements into the active document and have >>> them "just work", and all the other issues are taken care of "for >>> free". >> >> I think that would be a fine solution. When I discussed this with >> various folks, that option came up as well, but some were concerned >> that a document might too heavy weight. >> >> Keep in mind that pages may have *many* <template> declarations. I'd >> expect a sophisticated page/app to have template declarations the >> hundreds if not thousands. > > Have you benchmarked it? ?Documents that lack browsing contexts are > actually pretty light. ?Most of the "weight" comes from browsing > context. ?As an example, we create and destroy a document every time > someone assigns to innerHTML. Nope. If the overhead of creating documents is a non-issue, then so-much-the-better. Would being a document imply <html> or <body>. I.e. would the following <template>Hello, World</template> Result in myTemplate.contentDocument being <html> <body>Hello, world</body> </html> ? > > Adam >
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 16:37:19 UTC